Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Cultural Brokering and Health Outcomes Discussion Study Paper
Module 2
In this second discussion, you will have an opportunity to locate an article from the Excelsior Library and share a resource with the class. In this Resource Sharing Discussion Forum, you will post an article to share as described below. Then you will respond to at least one other classmate. You will also moderate your post so that you can respond to your classmates who comment on your post.
Go the Excelsior College Library (Links to an external site.) and find an article no more than 5 years old that addresses some aspect of culture that impacts health care. For example, you might select an article that discusses cultural perspectives on pain or illness in the family, or one that discusses health care patterns or disparities for a particular culture. (Remember there are many cultural groups, extending well beyond race/ethnicity or religion. This should help you to select a topic of interest.) Try to choose an article that you would enjoy talking with your peers about – something that piques your interest.
Next, compose a post that responds to the following questions. Please address both parts in your initial post. Your initial post should not exceed a page. Each section can be done thoughtfully in a well edited paragraph. The goal is to share your findings in a way that engages your classmates and encourages responses.
Part I – Provide a brief summary of the article in one paragraph. Your brief summary should include the direct link to the article, a complete APA citation, the purpose or goal of the article, and the main points made by the author concerning identified barriers to culturally or linguistically appropriate care.
Part II – In your second paragraph, identify which of the six cultural brokering examples in Appendix A of the Georgetown Cultural Brokering Guide (Links to an external site.) [PDF, File Size 304 KB] most closely aligns with the cultural issue profiled in your chosen article. Based on what we have learned this week, would another form of cultural broker be equally or more culturally appropriate? Please explain.
Post your response no later than the fifth day (Friday) of this module so that other members of the class will have an opportunity to read your posting. Students are encouraged to read through the posted resources and use the citations to secure articles that are of interest.
Consult the Discussion Posting Guide for information about writing your discussion posts. It is recommended that you write your post in a document first. Check your work and correct any spelling or grammatical errors. When you are ready to make your initial post, click on “Reply.” Then copy/paste the text into the message field, and click “Post Reply.”
To respond to a peer, click “Reply” beneath her or his post and continue as with an initial post.
This discussion will be graded using a rubric. Please review this rubric prior to beginning the discussion. You can view the rubric on the Course Rubrics page within the Start Here module. All discussions combined are worth 35% of your final course grade.
Completion of this discussion assesses the following outcomes:
Apply cultural brokering concepts to culturally diverse groups. (CO4)
Analyze the use of culturally and linguistically appropriate services in health settings. (C
Cultural Brokering and Health Outcomes Discussion Study Paper
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Cultural Brokering and Health Outcomes Discussion Study Paper |
Cultural Brokering and Health Outcomes Discussion Study Paper