Cumulative Case Analysis Case Assignment

Cumulative Case Analysis Case Assignment

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

Cumulative Case Analysis Case Assignment

Please review the USA Today, CNN and CNBC (video at end) articles on Canvas about Jack in the Box acquiring Del Taco and use that information to answer the following questions: (Your submission should be a minimum of 750 words, but should not exceed 3000 words.)

1) What form or form(s) of strategy (e.g. intended, emergent, etc.) does the acquisition of Del Taco by Jack in the Box represent? What form does the sale of Qdoba represent? Explain.

2) Complete a PESTEL analysis of the fast food industry. What are the most critical factors? Why?

3) Use the five forces model to analyze competition in the fast food industry. What strategies are key companies pursuing? What does your analysis show? Which force is the strongest? Which is the weakest? Discuss in detail.

4) Based on the articles provided, what business level strategy is Jack in the Box pursuing? Provide evidence from the articles to support your answer.

5) What corporate strategy does the purchase of Del Taco represent for Jack in the Box? What corporate strategy does the sale of Qdoba represent. Explain.

6) Using the BCG matrix to analyze the business units of Jack in the Box, how would you classify Qdoba? How would you classify Del Taco? Why?

7) Do you think the acquisition of Del Taco is a good strategy for Jack in the Box? Why or why not?

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow

Analyze the Water Footprint Results

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!