Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Data Collection Tools Disunion and Peer Response
Please identify three data collection tools (ex: mail/phone surveys, intercept/arranged interviews, focus groups, Internet cookies) that you could use to survey possible stakeholders. After choosing your data collection methods, please answer the following questions:
Statistically speaking, does your data collection method have a high or low participation rate?
What information would you like to uncover during this process?
Does your survey instruments violate HIPAA or any other healthcare laws?
How can it benefit your organization?
Please list two questions that you will include on your survey or questionnaire.
PEER RESPONSE Sara
I would have to say the three data tools I would choose would be observation, survey, and one on one interviews. Surveys are a very common tool to use in a larger population and is used in a different number of reasons. Hipaa laws are there for reasons for the individual to keep them safe. My two questions would be. What could be changed or fulfulled differently? What can we do to serve you better?
Data Collection Tools Disunion and Peer Response
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
|