Data Science and Big Data Analysis
Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages: 5-10 Instructions:
The literature review portion of your dissertation cannot be written in a just a few weeks. Instead, it takes a very long time to collect material, then read, understand, and synthesize it before deciding on its usefulness for your research. Last week UC provided an updated link to many helpful resources, including ZOTERO, reference management software, intended to assist with your individual research efforts.
a. Review the information contained in this article relative to what constitutes a literature review: https://www.scribbr.com/dissertation/literature-review/
b. Discuss your existing and proposed plan for reference management. Include your preferences for what type of tool you find useful and why. (There are many available tools. Some individuals prefer using software such as Zotero while others prefer to create their own database and systematic approach.)
c. Discuss ways in which your proposed approach will assist you in your current classes as well as in your dissertation preparation.
As always, use your own words and cite and reference as appropriate.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Data Science and Big Data Analysis