decimal value for the markup rate
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
decimal value for the markup rate
The amount of markup was found to be
M = $530.40,
but we need to find the percent markup,
%MCOST.
The markup amount will be compared to the price the wholesaler paid using the following equation. Note that the percent markup found will be a decimal and must then be converted to a percent.
%MCOST =
M C The wholesaler paid $680 for the guitar, so we have
C = $680.
Substitute the values for M and C into the equation.
%MCOST =
M C
=
530.40
= This is the decimal value for the markup rate so it needs to be multiplied by 100% to find the percent markup. Thus, the percent markup is
%.
The cost of the watch to the wholesaler is $90 and we determined that as a decimal,
100% + %MCOST = 1.35.
Substitute the cost of the watch and the decimal form of
100% + %MCOST
into the equation to find the selling price of the watch (in $).
SP = C(100% + %MCOST) = 90(135%) = 90
= $ The wholesale cost of the birdcage was given to be $55, so we have
C = $55.
We determined that as a decimal,
100% − %MSP = 0.53.
Substitute these values into the equation to find the original selling price (in $) of the birdcage, rounding the result to the nearest cent.
SP0 =
C 100% − %MSP
=
$55
= $
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Analyze the Water Footprint Results