Define and Explain Two Common Types of Receivables
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Define and Explain Two Common Types of Receivables
APA Format
In 300-400 words, define and discuss the following
Define and explain two common types of receivables.
Why does a business depreciate?
What are three methods of depreciation?
Provide the formula for each of the three methods of depreciation along with an example and rationale for use.
Example would-be straight-line depreciation, provide the formula, and why a business would choose to use it.
In 300-400 words, define and discuss the following:
Estimated and contingent liabilities
The difference between gross and net take home pay
The difference between employer payroll taxes and withholding deductions
FICA
FUTA and SUTA
In 300-400 words, define and discuss the following:
Discuss debt and equity financing.
How are they different?
What is the Time Value of Money and how does it relate to valuation of bonds?
Discuss bonds at par, premium, and discounted
What is the difference between the coupon rate and market rate?
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow