Describe an appropriate multi-attribute decision making Essay Solution

Describe an appropriate multi-attribute decision making

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

Describe an appropriate multi-attribute decision making

The Power Point slide that describes the paper：

Your Capstone Assignment: Term Paper (revised 04/22/20) Tell the story you are most interested in. What environmental problem do you aspire to solve?

1. What’s happening? Why do we care? [10%]
2. Why is it happening? [20%]
3. Ways to respond – Consider alternative ways we can respond – policies, practices, projects, programs [10%]
4. Finding the “best” way – Describe an appropriate multi-attribute decision making (MADM) method for policy analysis, including the ways you might choose to define “best”. Use what you have learned from the class to date, what you learn from me, Prof. Ratick (week 12,13), and any literature sources [50%]
5. Concluding Remarks and Reflection [10%]

Guidance: Work individually or in groups with the same interest. As a rough guide only, an individual paper is about 6-8 double-spaced pages, a group paper about 10-12 (not including references and any Appended materials). If you have anxiety about writing a paper of sufficient quality in the time available, I am willing to receive requests to do a short presentation in addition (but this is optional).

Grade weight: 40% of total.

The PowerPoint slide that describes the paper in the week 11 slides and it was revised word acount. Week 11 slides introduced the paper and talked how to write 1. what’s happening? Why do we care? 2. Why is it happening? 3. Ways to respond. About 4. Find the “Best” way, comparing policy option the way needs to use MADM and other methods, which is introduced in week 11, 12, 13, 14.

Pay Attention:

This is a Policy Analysis class, so make sure you focus most on the MADM (and other methods) to use for comparing policy options. This should be clear in the PowerPoint slide that describes the paper. How do you compare the policy options you will identify to address the air pollution problem?

Use the methods which were introduced in Week 11, 12, 13, 14.

1. a) indicators and scenarios of SD and climate change; b) being willing to challenge the decision criteria used in benefit/cost analysis (BCA) and multi-attribute methods (MADM) (Sam, Rob & Tim);  and c) decision making under high uncertainty that involves systemic risk analysis

Course Introduction:

Week 11:

We will be talking to class about enhanced EIA applied to Sustainable Development Visioning & Planning.

Week 12:

we will be going over Benefit Cost Analysis, Discounting and Net Present value. Please use the attached documents and for the below –

• Students should read the Word document “Cost Benefit Analysis Chapter 12_2_19 V1 SR.docx” before class.
• The Excel Workbook “Discounting for PRACTICE.xlsx” goes along with the book chapter and contains a tutorial on how to perform discounting.  Students should attempt this before Thursdays class.
• The attached PowerPoint “Benefit-Cost Analysis First and Second Lecture.pptx” will be used in the class on Thursday.
• For optional reading the pdf “Ch9_10_Stokey_Zeck.pdf”.

Week 13:

• Read “Chapter 5 SMART and AHP V8 1 18 2016.docx” and try the example in it. It discusses Simple Multi-Attribute Rating Technique (SMART) and the Analytical Hierarchy Process (AHP).
• Practice on the Excel workbook “Student Examples for SMART_AHP Chapter AHP added V1.xlsx” as it follows along with the text and works you through the techniques.
• We will use the “MCS Chapter 5 SAMRT and AHP SR FOR Cases in ……” Powerpoint presentation for class
• Please glance over the Monte Carlo simulation again as we will go over it again in class if we have time

Week 14:

Describe an appropriate multi-attribute decision making

we will be placing “Policy Analysis” (PA) in the context of Sustainable Development for the 21st Century (SD21 Report – attached). Skim through the report, landing on places where PA has a key role. Think of the types of PA being called for: context, methods, and applications. Play attention to the kinds of scenarios being considered, and the impacts and indicators that can be used to compare options.

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow

Describe an appropriate multi-attribute decision making

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!