Designer Babies and Stem Cells Discussion

January 4, 2023

Designer Babies and Stem Cells Discussion

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10

Instructions:

Designer Babies and Stem Cells Discussion

I’m trying to learn for my Health & Medical class and I’m stuck. Can you help?

Comment this

I enjoyed reading your post! I found your comment about humans’ beings being stewards of God because God gives life, to be very interesting. I had never thought about life in that way. Thinking in those terms really switches the focus from “me” to what can I do to please God, in other words, what I am here for and how can I leave the world a better place?

Thank you for that. I also agree with your statement at the end of your post that all of these issues, specifically stem cell research have positive and negative elements. I was not very familiar with stem cell research and took this as an opportunity to do a bit of research.

To me, it seems very wrong that IVF embryos that are “not needed” are given to research. Something about that does not sit well with me. It is a very delicate and complicated subject, because as you said much good can come from research as well. I found the link below to be very informative. Thank you for your post!

Designer Babies and Stem Cells Discussion

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met

You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow