Designing Algorithm Using Both Pseudocode and A Flowchart Solution 1

October 1, 2022

Designing Algorithm Using Both Pseudocode and A Flowchart

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

Designing Algorithm Using Both Pseudocode and A Flowchart

The goal of this project is to test your knowledge of the basics of programming structures. More specifically, you will design your own algorithm using both pseudocode and a flowchart.

Think of some daily activities that you perform. You are going to prepare a plan and design an algorithm that can be translated into a program that would tell a computer how to do the activity you have chosen.

In paragraph form, describe in detail the big picture, the final goal, and the individual stages of your algorithm. If there are issues to overcome, write out possible solutions for each.

Also, describe your inputs, outputs, decisions, and repetitions in the algorithm. Think about sequence when writing this out.

Using the standard notation for pseudocode that you have learned, write out the algorithm for the daily activity you have selected. Be sure to indent where required.

Using your pseudocode from step two, create a flowchart of your algorithm. Utilize the correct symbols in your flowchart that you learned about in the module.

Submit your work in the submission link above.

Include a header on your document that contains your first and last name, the assignment name, and the course code from page two of the syllabus

Designing Algorithm Using Both Pseudocode and A Flowchart

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met