Determining the Relative Importance of Compensable Factors
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Determining the Relative Importance of Compensable Factors
Recommended Readings
1. Read the following journal articles for further insight into this week’s topics:
· Weinberger, T.E. (1995, April). Determining the relative importance of compensable
factors. Compensation & Benefits Management, 11(2), 17. Retrieved from the Proquest
database.
· Richards, D.A. (2006, May). High-involvement firms: Compensation strategies and
underlying values. Compensation and Benefits Review, 38(3), 36-49,4-5. Retrieved
from the Proquest database.
2. You will find a list of websites that you may find useful under Course Materials in your
online classroom.
Discussions To participate in the following discussions, go to this week's Discussion link
in the left navigation.
1. Compensation Strategy Discuss the general goals of an organization's
compensation system, including how a compensation strategy works to support the
organization's business strategy.
2. Compensation Practices Discuss the various factors that influence a company’s
competitive strategies and compensation practices. Assess how a company can
mitigate these factors using effective compensation practices
bboard_assignment_6_w_2014-1.docx
Home>Science homework help>IET 101 Homework
Machine Lab Tour
20 PTS
IET 101 Winter 2014
Please complete and submit at the beginning of class on Tuesday, 2/18 at the
beginning of class.
We visited the Machine Lab this week in Hogue Hall. Your task is to research and find
one “machine shop” here in the United States. Explain what they produce, where they
are located, four products produced at the location, any technology used from design to
machining, who their customers are, and any other information you feel is relevant.
Next, choose one of the many CNC software programs in the market today. Include how
it works, the market it is sold to, what can be made using it, and other information you
feel is relevant. Any pros/cons? Explain.
Finally, compare/contrast both a CNC lathe v. a normal lathe, and a CNC mill v. a
normal mill. Provide two examples of parts/items created on each of the CNC lathe and
normal lathe, the CNC mill and a normal mill. Are there any pros/cons of using one or
both method? Explain. You may reference your class notes from lecture or internet
resources.
Your final submission must be at least one-page double spaced. Please include all
website or class note resources and one picture of each of the four machines on the
same page, but on a separate page from the text. Be ready to submit on Tuesday 2/18,
at the beginning of class. Please make sure to staple the pages of your submission.
Have a good weekend.Determining the Relative Importance of Compensable Factors
Determining the Relative Importance of Compensable Factors
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow