Dev Authentic Assessments Essay Assignment
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Dev Authentic Assessments Essay Assignment
Subject: Education
Topic: Dev Authentic Assessments
Paper details:
Read through the following three scenarios. Choose two of them, and develop at least one performance task, one authentic assessment, and a rubric (holistic or analytic) for each. You are experiencing drought in your state. The governor has asked your class to come up with solutions to produce more water and promote conservation to residents. You have been given $5,000 to redesign your classroom. The principal has tasked your class with creating an accurate and detailed drawing of the finished classroom and coming up with a detailed budget for making all of the changes.
You must also justify how each budget item supports learning. There has been great debate and outrage over a new rule that was issued in the cafeteria that students are not allowed to get out of their seats until the bell rings. The principal has tasked your class with investigating the root cause of this issue and issuing a verdict as to whether the rule is just, fair, and should remain in effect. Your performance tasks, assessments, and rubrics should include the following: Elements of guided practice and active and engaging tasks.
Opportunities to extend the learning beyond objectives. Opportunities to provide remediation for struggling learners and for troubleshooting during unit completion. Tasks that ask students to engage in critical thinking and problem-solving skills. Assessments that directly measure real-world application of each of the skills and concepts you want students to know and/or be able to do in each scenario. Additional Requirements Make sure you describe each authentic assessment in enough detail that anyone reading your work could implement the assessment in his/her classroom.
Cite at least two reputable sources to support your work. Your paper should span 3–5 pages. Be sure to follow the Doc Assessments Template when describing and analyzing the authentic assessment you develop for each scenario. ——Rubric, must follow the rubric below they only use this to grade the paper and must meet this qualifications———– 1. Creates a performance task for each scenario that provides students with meaningful practice and application of concepts and skills, and that provides differentiation to meet the needs of all learners, and ensures that each task is anchored in best practice strategies for learning and engagement. 2.
Creates an authentic assessment for each scenario that directly measures the skills and knowledge students are asked to practice and apply, and ensures that each assessment is anchored in best practice strategies for assessing students. 3. Creates a holistic or analytic rubric that directly measures what students are expected to know and/or do for each performance task and authentic assessment, and ensures that each assessment is anchored in best practice strategies for rubric design. 4. Analyzes how the performance tasks, authentic assessments, and rubrics will authentically guide and measure real-world application of each of the skills and concepts students are asked to demonstrate in each scenario.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow