Develop A Quality Management Plan and A Risk Management Plan for the Program
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Develop A Quality Management Plan and A Risk Management Plan for the Program
The project management office (PMO) director would like you to develop a quality management plan and a risk management plan for the program of one of the two software projects.
Create a project plan with the following components. Upload on MS Word document as the project plan.
Title page and abstract/executive summary
Work Breakdown Structure: MS Word
Activity/Network Diagram: MS Word
Critical Path
Logical relationships
Lead/lag
ES/EF/LS/LF
Schedule: Embed MS Project into the Word document
50-65 tasks with duration, predecessors, and resources assigned
Budget: Embed MS Excel into the Word document
By work, material, cost
By activities – level 3
Change Management Plan: MS Word
Process
Form(s)
Communication Management Plan
Matrix
Risk Management Plan: Include numbering convention, risk identification, impact, probability, and response in the plan.
Quality Management Plan
Procurement Management Plan
Source Selection Criteria
Make-or-buy Decisions
Stakeholder Management Plan
Stakeholder register
Stakeholder engagement assessment matrix
References page
Basic APA formatting includes 1-inch margins, double-spacing throughout the paper, page numbers in the upper right-hand corner, paragraphs indented 5–7 spaces, and first-level headings centered and in bold font.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Develop A Quality Management Plan and A Risk Management Plan for the Program