Develop Analysis
Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages: 5-10 Instructions:
Description / paper instructions
Your responsibilities include:
Task 1. Develop Analysis of the product requirements:
PC1.1: Identify the problem and produce a design brief
PC1.2: Research into the problem and identify the requirements and constraints. (Consider such factors as: Function, performance, the environment,
aesthetics, ergonomics, safety, the customer, the culture, the law, size, costs, materials, quantity, time and manufacturing
resources.) PC1.3: Produce a detailed specification of requirements (Product Design Specification)
Task 2. Complete an engineering design of the product.
PC2.1: Sketch and annotate a range of creative ideas and for the product. Creative ideas include detailed assembly/sub-assembly sketches PC2.2: Model the best ideas in CAD and evaluate these ideas against design specifications.
PC2.3: Develop the final detailed design, including engineering drawings and diagrams to allow manufacture of the product.
Task 3. Plan for manufacture
PC3.1: Choose the sequence of activities to complete manufacture within in the required timeframe.
PC3.2: Select industrially accepted planning tools and techniques and use these to plan activities in detail. (e.g. Gantt charts & activity planningplease take the Assessment task into consideration and the image contains most of what should be paid attention to it
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Develop Analysis
Develop Analysis