Development for A Major Casino Brand
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Development for A Major Casino Brand
You are VP of Development for a major casino brand. Your CEO has asked you to evaluate this state for merger / acquisition / management / build activity.
You must report back to the senior group giving a summary of the state of gaming in this state, along with your recommendation of whether to start a conversation with local lawmakers or decline to participate in this market. • Each group is assigned one gaming state to research and report.
use: ILLINOIS
AGA State of the States is a GREAT start, but your research must go beyond this.
Be sure to include:
Age of industry
Number and Nature of properties (land, river, native American, slots only?)
Total revenue, employees
Tax rate and stability
Number of competitors
Three- and five-year revenue trends, last expansion and outcome…
Other large industry in this region
Recent hot topics / activity around gaming
6 pages minimum, 12 pt. font,
- Please include helpful exhibits / charts, these are in addition to “6 pages”
- Def find and use 2019 American Gaming Association State of the States Report
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow