Diagnosis Of Reactive Attachment Disorder (RAD) Easy

October 3, 2022

Diagnosis Of Reactive Attachment Disorder (RAD) Easy

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

Diagnosis Of Reactive Attachment Disorder (RAD) Easy

The area of attachment and bonding has become a significant area of debate in the field in recent years. Over the past ten years, the diagnosis of Reactive Attachment Disorder (RAD) has continued to rise.

More and more research on RAD, a serious condition in which infants and young children do not establish healthy bond with parents or caregivers has been occurring.

The premise is that because the child’s instinctual needs for comfort, affection, and nurturing are not met, he or she never establishes loving and caring attachments with others.

The disruption is thought to cause problems with brain development as well. Class – What are your thoughts? Are attachments instinctual and do they influence personality development? How can be brain development be impaired?

Respond in 1000 words with a scholarly reference. Use citations, site your work and add references.

Diagnosis Of Reactive Attachment Disorder (RAD) Easy

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met