digital presentation from social media hashtags

July 15, 2021

digital presentation from social media hashtags

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

Description
1st Assignment: [#hashtag] Slideshow Presentation (ten percent of the grade): In this assessment activity, you will select a current hashtag and develop a digital presentation based on the categories indicated below using an internet platform of your choosing.

Your assignment is to develop an 8- to 12-slide presentation about a specific hashtag that is being utilized to form a digital community. Your presentation should show how social groups and/or non-profit organizations are using the hashtag as a tool for awareness, community, and spreadability.

Make sure to include the following in your presentation:

An explanation of where it came from (if possible).

An examination of its popularity and utility (i.e., clarify particular sites, demographics, trending info, etc.).

A discussion of how it relates to the course’s major terms (i.e., participatory media, viral media, etc.).

Media coverage, as well as reactions to/discussions about this hashtag.

Examples of how it’s been used in both positive and negative ways on social media sites. Finish with a critical critique (1-2 slides) that clarifies the presentation’s success as a form of digital interaction. Create the slideshow in a standard presentation application like Keynote or PowerPoint, or send a Prezi link to your instructor.

Send the material to a member of the Open Learning Faculty for review. Send a document with the URL to the Open Learning Faculty Member if you wish to do the project in an online format, such as Prezi.

Examine the available grading rubric to see how the task will be graded.htags

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met