Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Approaches Discussion Solution

October 5, 2022

Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Approaches Discussion

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Approaches Discussion

Watch the “Learning from the Gecko” video below. The experiments that the interdisciplinary teams conducted on the gecko are interesting and produce some incredible results.

One thing you may not pick up on in the video is one part of the team admits they would have never thought about looking at the problem from a certain perspective without having been asked about it from another part of the team.

At some point some of the researchers were looking at the problem from a disciplinary lens instead of an interdisciplinary lens. As you watch the video, see if you can recognize the disciplinary perspectives and the connections the team was able to make. Then see if you can recognize the integration that exists in that video. How did they apply what they were learning?

Learning from the Gecko (Links to an external site.)

After you have watched the “Learning from the Gecko” video, watch the “Mighty Mug” video below. What connections can you make from these two videos?

The Mighty Mug (Links to an external site.)

Disciplinary and Interdisciplinary Approaches Discussion

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met