Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Discussing and analyzing DNA
As you study DNA, you find that every person’s DNA is different from another’s. Identical twins
are the only people whose DNA is the same. Consider your parents and your siblings. Even
though your brother and your sister have the same parents, it is unlikely that you look exactly
like them unless you are identical twins. You may have common features, and you will all share
common DNA among yourselves, but only identical twins will have the exact same DNA. DNA
testing is used for many reasons, such as the following:
Identify potential suspects whose DNA may match evidence left at crime scenes
Exonerate persons wrongly accused
Match organ donors
Assignment Guidelines
- Address the following in 4–5 pages:
o In your first case, you have been asked to list and explain the steps that you would
use to identify and analyze DNA from a person who has been in prison for 10
years. The results of your test may exonerate the person.
- Once the physical evidence has been delivered to the forensics lab, what is
the process of identifying DNA? Be specific, and explain in detail.
- Consider that the evidence is over 10 years old.
- Once the DNA evidence has been identified, what is the process of
analyzing the DNA? Be specific, and explain in detail.
- What challenges exist that can make your analysis inadmissible in
court? Explain.
o How are tissue matches made? Explain.
o Why is it important to utilize different DNA testing methods? Explain.
- Why is it that some methods may be preferred over others? Explain.
o Other than forensic uses, DNA testing is essential in paternity testing.
- What are the steps used to carry out a paternity test? Explain in detail.
- Why might the results of a paternity test be significant in a court case?
Explain.
- Be sure to reference all sources using APA style.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Analyze the Water Footprint Results