Discussion 2 essay Penpal
Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages: 5-10 Instructions:
Discussion 2 essay Penpal
Question Description
1. Refer back to what you’ve learned in your VHL Central Portales lessons.2. Go to the Pen-Pal 2 Discussion Topic, and post a new thread:
Your Pen-Pal is coming to visit you and is interested in finding out about your daily diet and the diet of your family. Write an e-mail to your Pen-Pal describing your daily menu. You should give your Pen-Pal an example by describing what you ate the day before for breakfast lunch, and dinner (using past tense).
Your initial post should be at least 6 sentences in length.
3. Return to the Pen-Pal 2 Discussion Topic after your initial post, and reply to a classmate’s initial post by comparing your daily menu with your classmate’s in Spanish. You should also include
what you ate the day before.
You must select a classmate’s post that does not already have a reply.
Attention! The initial posting and question should be done by the Thursday of the second week of lesson 8 at 11:59 pm. If a question is not posted below your initial posting by Thursday at 11:59
pm, your instructor will post a question. You will not be able to get credit for the question if it is not posted on time.
4. Return to the Pen-Pal 2 Discussion Topic after a classmate has replied to your original post. Post a reply to the post.Hey, please assist and also include 2 general replies that I do not have to change much. I like to eat bacon, bread and plantain for breakfast and since I work multiple jobs, I eat multiple lunch etc. Just build from the previous discussion and let me know if you need anything from.
Discussion 2 essay Penpal
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Discussion 2 essay Penpal
Discussion 2 essay Penpal