Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
This week, you will continue to participate in a peer review process where you will envision yourself in a specific role and you will provide feedback through that lens. Your feedback involves giving and receiving input regarding the feedback to your course work from your peers. Each week, you will upload your portfolio element completed the week before to the weekly discussion board. You will then become part of a scenario, in which you will be asked to provide constructive feedback to your peers, reflect on what you have learned in the process about the portfolio element, and what you have learned that will help you further improve your own work. Be sure to take time during and after the discussion to reflect on the process and the feedback you gave and received. Also, review the feedback that others provided to your peers for input that might help you further improve your own portfolio element.
In this discussion, imagine that you were recently promoted to the Lead Outside Sales Representative. About a year ago, you submitted a very similar idea to Ms. Miller regarding having a social media presence. You also presented to the team just like this presentation given in the previous week. However, the marketing department quickly dismissed your idea. It appears the new employee has had better luck convincing the team. Your presentation was recorded, and you still have access to the recording.
For the purpose of this scenario, your Week 4 presentation is the one the current employee is referring to as being dismissed by the marketing team and your peers presentation is the new one recently presented to Ms. Miller and her team. Compare your presentation to that of the new employee and determine what improvements the new employee made.
Review at least two of your peers See attachment Business Presentation and provide feedback using the scenario presented.
Assignment:
Review & Respond to at least two (2) of your peers posts in the following manner:
Compare and contrast your presentation to that of your peer.
Evaluate the effectiveness of the presentation by discussing the construction of the presentation, the inclusion of information, and use of pictures and/or animation.
Identify one element that you would incorporate into your presentation if given an opportunity by specifically discussing how it improves the outcome for the presentation.
3 4 paragraph response per each colleague
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
Discussion 2 Peer Feedback Communication Portfolio