discussion about algorithms and their roles

July 24, 2021

discussion about algorithms and their roles

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

At the most basic level, an algorithm is simply a set of step-by-step instructions that we utilize to accomplish a specific task. We use algorithms every single day in our day-to-day activities: Brushing our teeth, getting dressed, driving to work, making dinner. These daily tasks which we complete are all composed of a set of instructions that starts with a certain action and ends with a certain action.

In the realm of computer programming, algorithms are utilized to enhance the efficiency, effectiveness, and functionality of the programs we create. Two such types of algorithms are searching algorithms and sorting algorithms.

Sorting algorithms are designed to sort an array of objects into a specific order. Searching algorithms are designed to compare the elements of an array to find a particular value within an array of objects. Just a few examples are search

engines, the sorting of a business online item inventory, and sorting/searching a database of students who attend a university.

There are multiple approaches which people have taken to solve the issue of sorting and searching an array of items. Two frequently used searching algorithms are linear search and binary search. Three frequently used sorting algorithms are

insertion sort, selection sort, and bubble sort.

Each of these types of algorithms have both pros and cons associated with them. The main properties that we want to keep an eye on when choosing an algorithm are memory usage, maintainability, and time complexity. It is always best to assess the situation and to use discretion when choosing which algorithm that we want to implement into our program.

discussion about algorithms and their roles

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met