Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Discussion Assignment in Political Science
Attending or seeing a city of Miami, FL or county government meeting and writing a brief critique of the events is required for this assignment.
You must attend a government meeting, such as a city commission meeting, county commission meeting, zoning board meeting, county/city committee meeting, or mayor’s or commissioner’s town hall. It can’t be a meeting of a political party or a non-profit community organization.
Meetings of many local government bodies are aired on television and online. If you can’t make it to a meeting in person, you can watch it online. Begin by searching the internet for meetings of your local city or county government, then work your way up from there.
Your response should be 500 words or less and should answer the following questions:
What kind of gathering did you go to?
Which members of the government were in attendance?
What problems were discussed by the officials?
What procedures did they use when making their decisions? (Did they, for example, hold elections?)
What methods did political leaders use to solicit and handle public input at the meeting?
What issues were brought to the attention of elected authorities by members of the public?
Make careful to explain each component of your response in detail, and to support and/or highlight your findings, use sources from class (readings or lectures).
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Discussion Assignment in Political Science |