Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Workforce Analytics and HR Metrics
On the relevance of metrics, see the video “The Power of HR Metrics: Growth, Performance, and Sustainment” (3m 35s).
Examine Case Study: Regional Hospital, which can be found on page 420 of the textbook. Please answer the following questions based on the film, your readings this week, and the case study:
Do you think Regional Hospital may benefit from an HR metrics and workforce analytics program?
What potential do you see for metrics and analytics in this organization, and how may they be used?
Determine three analyses and associated indicators that you believe Regional Hospital should investigate.
Ethics and Leadership
Examine a leader’s leadership in your current or previous organization in terms of the seven ethical leadership habits.
Determine one area in which this leader may improve, and offer one action that this leader could take to accomplish this.
1 of 2 slides
Discussion of HR Metrics and Workforce Analytics in Week 8
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Discussion of HR Metrics and Workforce Analytics in Week 8 |
Discussion of HR Metrics and Workforce Analytics in Week 8