Discussion of the Lutheran Bible

July 22, 2021

Discussion of the Lutheran Bible

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

Discussion of the Lutheran Bible

W6D1: THE MOST EXCELLENT TEACHER YOU’VE EVER HAD
Your All-Time Favorite Professor

In your early years, who was the best instructor you ever had?
What did you take away from her/him that you are still using today?
How does the Gospel of John work as a teacher in the same way?
W6D2: THIS IS MY IDENTITY.
This is my identity.

The seven I Am statements found in John 6:35, 8:12, 10:7, 10:11-14, 11:25-26, 14:6, 15:1 define Jesus. Read these statements in their entirety, as well as the context in which they were made. Pick at least two to talk about.

Why did Jesus use these terms to describe himself?
What distinguishes the two statements that you’ve chosen?
1 page is required.

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met