Discussion on Environmental Ethics solution

July 12, 2021

Discussion on Environmental Ethics

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

Description:

Choose one of the following topics to respond to for your first post in this forum. When responding to your peers, first respond to a learner who has expressed an opposing viewpoint on the topic you chose, and then respond to a learner who has expressed an opposing viewpoint on a topic you did not choose.

The first topic is environmental ethics.

Go to http://plato.stanford.edu/ and look up the term “environmental ethics,” then answer the following questions: Do you believe a book, a plant, or a structure can be said to have its own good? Is it possible to act in the best interests of the company? Is it interested in something? Explain your responses and whether you believe there is a good reason to consider them to have intrinsic value.

Self-Evident Intuitions (Topic B)

“…a theory that leads to an examination of the psychological and historical origins of people’s moral opinions should be more useful than a theory that postulates moral truths enunciated by unchangeable self-evident intuitions,” Westermarck writes. Agree or disagree, and explain why.

Final Thoughts:

Finally, please consider the following:

How will you incorporate ethics into your current or future profession?

How will you approach ethics as a professional skill?

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met