Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
In one or two paragraphs, respond to each of the following questions (1-1.5 pages long length in total). You are free to use any of the sources that have been assigned to you. Your responses must be written in your own words.
1) Summarize Peter Singer’s argument that we have a moral obligation to assist those who are poor. Do you agree or disagree with this statement? Give an explanation for your response.
– Sources: The Life You Can Save.pdf (pages 26 to 258) (see attachment)
2) Describe why Kentaro Toyama believes that technology alone will not be able to solve the poverty problem.
Can Technology Help to End Poverty? – Sources: Can Technology Help to End Poverty?
3) Explain how technology HAS been successful in alleviating poverty using one of the examples given in any of the readings, videos, or podcasts for this module.
– References: To be effective, initiatives to bridge the digital divide must last beyond the COVID-19 pandemic (Links to an external site.)
10 Technological Poverty Solutions (Links to an external site.)
Study by the United Nations: Digitization of Kenyan Farmer Payments Aids Poverty Reduction
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Discussion on Technological Solutions to Poverty |
Discussion on Technological Solutions to Poverty