Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
I’m working on a film writing assignment and need a sample draft to study for it.
PART ONE: Watch the video above and read the information below.
Matthew Burtner composed the music.
Climate Change Dance and Music “Wind Rose” is a collaboration between choreographer Jody Sperling and composer Matthew Burtner, both of whom are known for their innovative approaches to environmental issues. The work is a study of breath and atmosphere, evoking wind patterns that are changing dramatically in tandem with the earth’s climate through sound and motion.
THE SECOND PART:
After you’ve watched the video, write down what you saw. Make sure to include information about the dance’s movements, costumes, location, and who is dancing, among other things. As long as you’re describing what you saw in the video, there’s no wrong way to respond. HINT (make sure your response includes the answer to this question): From your readings, lectures, and video work in module two, which modern dance choreographer does this piece remind you of?
Your response should be at least 5-7 sentences long, but it can be longer if necessary. Please make sure your response is written correctly.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Discussion on the Wind Rose |
Discussion on the Wind Rose