Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Dissemination of Results from an Evidence-Based Capstone Project
Part 6: Disseminating Results of the Evidence-Based Capstone Project
The dissemination of EBP findings serves a variety of purposes. The case for your decisions is strengthened by sharing the results. It also contributes to the body of knowledge, opening doors for future practitioners. By presenting your findings, you become an advocate for EBP, fostering a culture that informs, educates, and promotes the effective use of EBP within your organization and beyond.
How to Get Ready:
Examine the final PowerPoint presentation you submitted in Module 5 and make any necessary changes based on the feedback you’ve received and the lessons you’ve learned so far.
Consider how you’ll get the word out to an audience about the results of your presentation.
Complete the following tasks:
Create a narrated PowerPoint presentation of your Evidence-Based Project that lasts 5 to 6 minutes and has 5 to 6 slides.
In Module 5, make sure to incorporate any feedback or changes you received from your presentation submission.
Describe how you would present your project’s findings to an audience. Give an explanation for why you chose this method of distribution.
Week 11’s fifth day
Submit Part 6 of your Evidence-Based Project, which is your revised PowerPoint presentation.
Submission
Learning Outcomes
Students will: Evaluate strategies for disseminating information
Recommend strategies for overcoming barriers to evidence-based practice change dissemination.
Compile a list of evidence-based practice concepts.
Justify the use of distribution strategies
sturti/E+/Getty images/sturti/E+/Getty images
Resources for Learning
Readings that are required
B. M. Melnyk and E. Fineout-Overholt (2018). Evidence-based nursing and healthcare practice: A guide to best practice (4th ed.). Wolters Kluwer, Philadelphia, PA.
Chapter 10, The Role of Outcomes in Evidence-based Quality Improvement and Enhancing and Evaluating Practice Changes (pp. 293312), discusses the role of outcomes in evidence-based quality improvement and enhancing and evaluating practice changes.
Chapter 12 (pp. 328343) is titled Leadership Strategies for Creating and Sustaining Evidence-based Practice Organizations.
Chapter 14, Models to Guide Evidence-based Practice Implementation and Sustainability (pp. 378427)
L. Gallagher-Ford, E. Fineout-Overholt, B. M. Melnyk, and S. B. Stillwell (2011). Evidence-based practice: A step-by-step guide to implementing a change in evidence-based practice. doi:10.1097/10.1097/01.NAJ.0000395243.14347.7e. American Journal of Nursing, 111(3), 5460. The full text of this article can be found at https://journals.lww.com/ajnonline/Fulltext/2011/03000/Evidence Based Practice, Step by Step .31.aspx.
R. P. Newhouse, S. Dearholt, S. Poe, L. C. Pugh, and K. M. White (2007). Evidence-based practice strategies for organizations. 552557 in Journal of Nursing Administration, 37(12). doi:0.1097/01.NNA.0000302384.91366.8f
This article is available through the Walden Library databases.
B. M. Melnyk, B. M. Melnyk, B. M. Melny (2012). Implementing the ARCC model for systemwide sustainability of evidence-based practice to create a high-reliability organization. 127135. Nursing Administration Quarterly, vol. 36, no. 2, pp. 127135. doi:10.1097/NAQ.0b013e318249fb6a
This article is available through the Walden Library databases.
B. M. Melnyk, E. Fineout-Overholt, L. Gallagher-Ford, and S. B. Stillwell (2011). Step-by-step implementation of evidence-based practice: sustaining evidence-based practice through organizational policies and an innovative model. doi:10.1097/01.NAJ.0000405063.97774.0e American Journal of Nursing, 111(9), 5760.
This article is available through the Walden Library databases.
B. M. Melnyk, E. Fineout-Overholt, M. Giggleman, and K. Choy (2017). The ARCC model is being tested to see if it can improve evidence-based practice implementation, healthcare culture, and patient outcomes. 59. doi:10.1111/wvn.12188. Worldviews on Evidence-Based Nursing, 14(1), 59.
This article is available through the Walden Library databases.
B. M. Melnyk, E. Fineout-Overholt, L. Gallagher-Ford, and S. B. Stillwell (2011). Step-by-step implementation of evidence-based practice: sustaining evidence-based practice through organizational policies and an innovative model. doi:10.1097/01.NAJ.0000405063.97774.0e American Journal of Nursing, 111(9), 5760.
This article is available through the Walden Library databases.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Dissemination of Results from an Evidence-Based Capstone Project |
Dissemination of Results from an Evidence-Based Capstone Project