Distinguishing Between a Problem and an Issue Discussion

October 6, 2022

Distinguishing Between a Problem and an Issue Discussion

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

Distinguishing Between a Problem and an Issue Discussion

The Final Offer Film Discussion Questions

Watch the film “Final Offer” and answer questions based on the requirements

Film Link:

BCOC Distinguishing Between a Problem and an Issue Discussion

Question Description

I’m working on a communications discussion question and need a reference to help me learn.

Distinguishing Between a Problem and an Issue (the idea should be related to the fact book of SWOSU, I prefer it to be related to international students)

Communication Ethics Moral Courage Discussion

I’m working on a communications discussion question and need support to help me learn.

Watch The Circle (https://www.ifsp.tv/play?id=SsNu6RyzlId) and then answer the following questions:

What did the organization need to decide?

What were the one or more moral problems?

How, if at all, did you empathize with Mae?

For what reasons, if any, did you admire Mae?

How, if at all, did you identify with Mae?

Is Mae one of your mentors? For what reasons?

Your answer should be academic as a communication professional. Please read the readings and cite properly. Please find the attached articles for references. Use at least 1 source from these readings.

Readings:

https://www.apa.org/topics/healthy-workplaces/work..

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met