Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Do Not Feed the Monkeys Game Critique Assignment
DISCUSSION ASSIGNMENT INSTRUCTIONS
The student will complete 1 Discussion in this course. The student will post one thread of at least
400 words by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Thursday of the assigned Module: Week. The student must
then post 2 replies of at least 200 words by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Monday of the assigned Module:
Week. For each thread, students must support their assertions with at least 1 scholarly citation.
Read a Scholarly Article about CQ: For this discussion, each student will need to select a scholarly journal article about CQ in a specific professional discipline. Note that a variety of articles have been provided in the Discussion Resources area below to relate to a large selection of degree fields and professional interests; however, if a student does not find an article that matches their interests, they can do their own research to find a different article. You should send the article to your professor and get prior approval before using an article if it is different than the ones provided.
Once you have read your article, please answer the following questions in your thread: (Questions in parenthesis are suggestions to help guide your writing).
Briefly summarize the article. (What were the researchers studying? What was the primary thesis of the article? How did they conduct their research? What were the results?)
Using this article as well as other course materials, discuss the implications of Cultural Intelligence in your chosen professional field. (What cross-cultural challenges exist in your profession? How will having high CQ help to address those challenges? What other research needs to be done in order to develop high CQ in your field?)
Imagine you were creating a professional development seminar on cultural intelligence for professionals in your chosen field. Aside from simply defining CQ, what topics would you focus on? How would you help your attendees practically apply CQ to your field? Discussion Resources
BUSINESS: Business Cultural Intelligence Quotient: A Five-Country Study (Links to an external site.)
BUSINESS: Cultural Intelligence in Organizations (Links to an external site.)
EDUCATION: Teaching with Cultural Intelligence: Developing Multiculturally Educated and Globally Engaged Citizens (Links to an external site.) (Links to an external site.) (Links to an external site.)
MISSIONS: Cultural Intelligence and Short-Term Missions (Links to an external site.)
SOCIAL WORK: Cultural Intelligence for Clinical Social Work Practice
Remember to include a citation for your article and any other sources you use at the bottom of your thread.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Do Not Feed the Monkeys Game Critique Assignment |
Do Not Feed the Monkeys Game Critique Assignment