Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
DOCS 714 Doctor of Health Administration Questions
Question 1: Based on the work that you completed in RES/709: Research Conceptualization and Design, review and revise your research method and design. Remember this is a fluid process and you should expect some suggestions for fine-tuning your method and design.
For the peer review:
State your program of study.
State your 1-sentence problem statement.
State your 1-sentence purpose statement.
Post your research methodology (proposed method and design).
Your faculty member and classmates will provide feedback in preparation for the Wk 7 – Prospectus: Research Methodology (Proposed Method and Design) and Research Questions assignment submission.
Question 2: Based on the work that you completed in RES/709: Research Conceptualization and Design, review and revise your research question(s). Remember this is a fluid process and you should expect some suggestions for fine-tuning your research question(s).
For the peer review:
State your program of study.
State your 1-sentence problem statement.
State your 1-sentence purpose statement.
Post your revised research methodology from Wk 7 Discussion 1 – Research Methodology (Proposed Method and Design).
Post your research question(s). If you are proposing a quantitative study, also post your hypotheses.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
|