dome in architecture final essay 1
Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 | Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages: 5-10 |
Instructions:
Description
I wrote first artifact ( pantheon) I am including if you want looked it let me know if you have question
6.Domes in Architecture: Start with the Pantheon; next move on to the Hagia Sofia; and finally move to the U.S. Capitol Dome. Compare and contrast them along the way. Be sure to compare the purposes of the building what the architect intended to portray and how things domes accomplish those things
Introduce all 3 artifacts
Summarize how they are linked
Not longer than ¾ page
First Artifact Stage 2 edited
Second Artifact Essay based on AA for this week
Third artifact Essay .
Conclusion
Summarizes what youve done in the paper
Links, influence and differences b/w artifacts
Not longer than ¾ page
Submit your final paper to the >Stage 3 Assignment Box. The final project is to be a formal paper following MLA format. It should include:
· Introductory paragraph which:
o States how the ancient artifact influences a current artifact.
o Introduces each artifact. Not a lot of info is necessary. Just introduce it.
§ Imagine you are introducing one person to anothergive their name and the relevant feature for this meeting/relationship.
§ Do that same with the artifactsgive their names, where and when they are from, and what their relevance is to this paper topic.
Part 1The Artifact Itself: This is the section of this stage where you explain the artifact itself, independent of its artistic/conceptual importance.
Conceptual/Story Topic:
Source
Who wrote it
What is the overall story from which your concept/story comes
Portraiture/Architecture:
Describe the artifact itself
Both: Explain the context within which it was created:
Where?
What is the history that influences this artifact?
Does the artifact have a purpose?
Part 2What makes this a masterpiece?
What is the style of this piece?
What does it accomplish?
How is it revolutionary?
How is it like or different from what comes before?
How does it influence other artifacts?
· Section 1: For the first artifact, insert what you wrote for Stage 2, with edits if necessary, here.
· Section 2: For the second artifact:
o Do the same thing you did for the first artifact (section 1).
o Add a paragraph comparing and contrasting this artifact with the first.
o Add another paragraph explaining how the first artifact influences this artifact.
· Section 3: For the final artifact:
o Do the same thing you did for the second artifact (Section 2).
o Be sure your two additional paragraphs include comparisons and influences by both artifacts.
· Conclusion paragraph which summarizes your main points.
Goal: To demonstrate in written form the continuity of elements in the European past with your own contemporary culture.
Part 1The Artifact Itself: This is the section of this stage where you explain the artifact itself, independent of its artistic/conceptual importance.
Conceptual/Story Topic:
Source
Who wrote it
What is the overall story from which your concept/story comes
Portraiture/Architecture:
Describe the artifact itself
Both: Explain the context within which it was created:
Where?
What is the history that influences this artifact?
Does the artifact have a purpose?
Part 2What makes this a masterpiece?
What is the style of this piece?
What does it accomplish?
How is it revolutionary?
How is it like or different from what comes before?
How does it influence other artifacts?
dome in architecture final essay 1
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow |
dome in architecture final essay 1