E.D. Caucasian Female Patient Case Study
Order ID: 89JHGSJE83839 Style: APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages: 5-10 Instructions:
E.D. Caucasian Female Patient Case Study
40 POINTS
This assignment builds upon the Module 4 Dropbox: Identification, Research, Analysis assignment you submitted
previously. Be sure to review the feedback you received from that assignment, and make any necessary revisions BEFORE moving forward with this assignment.
Focusing on the same case as before, you will now complete the fourth step of the critical thinking process: 4)
Application. You will apply a Consequential Ethical Theory – Act Utilitarianism – to resolve the main ethical/moral issue.
Again, review the case in the Ethics textbook Chapter 24: Case 6, Life on the Streets.
Follow the Sample Format: Application – Act Utilitarianism, and submit to this Dropbox using MLA formatting.Apply Act Utilitarianism, as follows:
Discussion (150 words minimum)
Paragraph – Summarize Act Utilitarianism. Include descriptions of the key terms/concepts: Utility, Net Utility, and
Happiness. Use your own words. Do not use quotations. Paraphrase the information, and provide in-text citation(s) with
the page number(s), where appropriate. In the Works Cited, be sure to cite your source(s).
Identification (one sentence in bold print)
Restate the main ethical/moral issue you previously identified in Module 4.
Analysis/Application – Act Utilitarianism (chart)
Use the same analysis chart you completed previously in Module 4 (following my feedback in Module 4 makenecessary changes). Include four options, four stakeholders, and possible consequences.
In the chart, enter the happiness number for each consequence.
Provide the happiness scale you used.
Add a row to the bottom of the chart, and add up the numbers for each option to indicate the total Net Utility for each
option. Remember, if a stakeholder is more than one person (e.g., group, team, family, citizens, business) estimate how
many are in the group, and multiply the happiness number by the number of persons in the group. If a stakeholder is one
person, multiplication is not needed.
Conclusion paragraph (150 words minimum)
o State the “best” option, and explain how a true Act Utilitarian would come to this conclusion. Include the Net Utility number, and explain how you determined the number. Be impartial. Avoid any bias; do not express your own personal opinion; do not use the words, “I think” or “I feel.”
Use the Dropbox Grading Criteria to help guide your completion of this assignment.
Dropbox Rules Use MLA Formatting. Double-space the entire document. Adjust all font color/style/size to black Times New Roman 12
pt. Put the heading in the upper left corner of the first page; include your name, the professor’s name, the course name, and the date. Use the document header to display your last name and page number in the upper right corner of each
page. Put the “Works Cited” on the last page, and the total word count at the end of the document.
Attach your submission in the proper Microsoft Word format .doc or .docx or .rtf.\E.D. Caucasian Female Patient Case Study
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow E.D. Caucasian Female Patient Case Study
E.D. Caucasian Female Patient Case Study