Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Earth Systems Engineering and Management considerations
How do YOU think we can help avoid a climate disaster? Research an existing emerging technology that can reduce green house gas pollutants in our atmosphere (either by reducing emissions or by removing CO2 that has already been emitted).
Present a clear, concise “project pitch” to the class (“investors”) describing this technology and convincing us to invest in the technology. In your presentation, provide a thesis statement (like in your book review), address Gates’s 5 Questions (listed below), and address how the technology relates to ESEM principles. Your presentation should be ~10 minutes in length (shorter is fine if you can cover all the necessary information in less time). The final slide of your presentation should include your references.
Gates’s Five Questions:
- How much of 51 billion tons are we talking about?
- What is your plan for cement? (This, obviously, is only applicable if your technology is related to cement.)
- How much power are we talking about?
- How much space do you need?
- How much is this going to cost?
Earth Systems Engineering and Management considerations:
- Capability to design, engineer, and manage, through dialog and continual feedback, integrated built/human/natural systems
- Achieve the multivariate and sometimes mutually exclusive goals and desires of humanity
- Personal, social, economic, technological, and environmental dimensions
- Constraints imposed by the states and dynamics of existing complex adaptive systems
In-class presentations on Monday, August 9th are highly encouraged. However, if you are not comfortable presenting in class you may submit a written paper (~5 pages) instead.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Analyze the Water Footprint Results