Eastlake versus Rocknoll and Rocknoll versus Bell Discussion solution

Eastlake versus Rocknoll and Rocknoll versus Bell Discussion

Instructions:

Eastlake versus Rocknoll and Rocknoll versus Bell Discussion

I’m working on a business law case study and need support to help me learn.

Brian Rocknoll owns a small outdoor supply store in Bloomington, Indiana. He is also an avid funk music fan. His store is called “Tent-It-And-Quit-It”, or TIAQI (tee-ah-qui) as the locals call it. He just placed a rather large order of several thousand custom tents, camp chairs, and blankets from a wholesaler called Eastlake Outdoors.

Each item will have his logo and slogan, “Papa’s Got a Brand New Tent”. To place the order, he sent in a physical order form, through USPS. The form was postmarked 2/25/2022. Satisfied that he had done a good week’s work, he closed up the shop and headed home for the weekend.

Over the weekend, he worked on his side hustle as a black-market luthier. Bloomington is home to one of the largest music schools in the country, so there are a lot of instruments that need to be fixed, but the “Cello Guild” tries to keep independent artisans out of the picture.

Brian repairs instruments in his shop after hours, and attempts to keep it secret from the Cello Guild, which requires a license to fix instruments. On Saturday, he gets a call from Joshua Bell, who needs his violin repaired ASAP, but he has been black balled by the Cello Guild.

He offers Brian $100,000 to fix it on Sunday. They do not write a contract, given the clandestine nature of the work, but Brian does record the phone conversation. He repairs the violin as requested on Sunday.

On Monday, Brian realizes that he mistakenly added a zero to his order with Eastlake, and he clearly did not need thousands of tents, but rather hundreds. The order as he sent it in would bankrupt his business. He writes up a letter and mails it to Eastlake on Tuesday (3/1/2022). On Monday, Eastlake received Brian’s initial order and began manufacture on the custom order. They did not receive Brian’s modification to the order until Thursday, and had already manufactured half of the requested tents.

Two weeks later, Brian calls Joshua Bell, but is unable to reach him, since he used a burner phone to arrange the details of the violin repair. Brian has still not been paid for his work on Joshua’s violin. Brian works with his local attorney (Ken Nunn) to file a claim against Joshua, including both compensatory damages, as well as punitive damages in excess of $1M. He claims that because he did not get paid in time, he was unable to see Earth, Wind, and Fire in their final performance, and that experience is “priceless.”

That same day, Brian receives his custom order from Eastlake. He accepts the hundreds of tents that he believes he ordered, and declines the rest of the custom pieces, sending them back to Eastlake. One week later, Eastlake calls him requesting payment in full. If he refuses, they will sue him.

What is the likely outcome of Eastlake v. Rocknoll? Why? What are the likely damages?

What is the likely outcome of Rocknoll v. Bell? Why? What are the likely damages?

Eastlake versus Rocknoll and Rocknoll versus Bell Discussion

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Eastlake versus Rocknoll and Rocknoll versus Bell Discussion

Eastlake versus Rocknoll and Rocknoll versus Bell Discussion

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!