ECN-351 Discussing the Monetary System Essay

October 12, 2022

ECN-351 Discussing the Monetary System Essay

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

ECN-351 Discussing the Monetary System Essay

Refer to the Chapter 21 textbook reading, which discusses the monetary system. Specifically review section 21-1, which focuses on the meaning of money and offers a discussion on the topic of cryptocurrencies.

Additionally, find an article using your subscription to the Wall Street Journal pertaining to cryptocurrency, stable coin, or Central Bank digital currency.

In your post, summarize the WSJ article and discuss the following:

Which digital currency is being examined in the selected WSJ article? How does it compare to each of the three required functions of money outlined in section 21-1 of the textbook reading?

How the use of cryptocurrency could change monetary policy and the management of money supply?

Compare the risks and benefits of cryptocurrency.

Provide a link to the article and support your answer with relevant ideas, facts, and examples.

CLASS: Know What You’re Talking About – DQ 2 Video and Rubric

WATCH THE VIDEO: Know What You’re Talking About: https://youtu.be/3Yc27MDngRQ
FOLLOW THE RUBRIC. Be sure to cover every point based on what you’ve seen in the video and what you’ve read in the class materials.

—————————————————–DQ 2 Rubric——————————————————–

Provide a link to your Wall Street Journal Article. —–Excellent: 1 ——— Missing: 0.

Explain your article and how the digital currency it discusses compares to the three functions of money. —–Excellent: 2 ——– Average: 1 ——— Missing or Incomplete: 0.

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met