ECN 500 Global Economics Comparative Advantage Paper
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
ECN 500 Global Economics Comparative Advantage Paper
In a critical essay, you will select a country of your choice and will compare your chosen country to KSA in relation to the factor endowment theory. For each country, discuss:
What is the impact of resource endowments on comparative advantage?
Is the factor-endowment theory a good predictor of trade patterns?
What additional trade theories can be applied? Explain their main insights and challenges. As one of the trade initiatives in KSA, assess the aims of Saudi Vision 2030 in relation to factor endowment theory.
Cost Analysis Worksheet
An American producer of steel produces and sells his products in two geographic regions: at home (H) and abroad (F). Demand in those markets is different. Also, production costs in those two regions are different. The demand function on the home market is PH = 260 – 0,1QH, and on the foreign market is PF = 240 (illimited amount can be sold for the price 240 dollars). Cost function on the home market is: CH = 1000 + 0,4Q2H, and on the foreign market: CF = 5000 + 0,25Q2F.
a)The products can not be exported due to high customs duties. Calculate the amount of production and prices on home and foreign markets to maximize profit. What will be the profit?
b)The company can export without limits and transport costs are low. Answer now the question from point a.
c) Now suppose that transport costs are 16 dol. per ton. Answer the question from point a.
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow ECN 500 Global Economics Comparative Advantage Paper
ECN 500 Global Economics Comparative Advantage Paper