Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
ECOM 500 Enterprise System Recommendation Discussion
Select an organization, national or international, that has implemented an ERP system. Then, address the following components in your paper:
What best practices did the organization use when implementing the ERP? Provide 2-3 specific examples.
What did the organization do poorly when implementing the ERP? What changes, as based upon the recommendations provided in the textbook, should have been made?
How are other organizations, in your selected organization’s industry, using ERPs? What recommendations, implemented by similar organizations in their industry, could your organization use to improve their ERP?
Human Resource Management Article Review and Critique
use the MGA library or the internet and look for an article in one of the following journals and follow the instructions below.
Human Resource Management
This 3-4-page summary is designed to help you become more familiar with reading and extracting information from empirical articles. From a scholarly journal, choose an empirical publication from the past 5-years (2015-2020); articles from earlier years will not be accepted. Please attach a copy or link to the article on the day of submission. The paper should be a critical analysis of the article not a mere summary.
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
ECOM 500 Enterprise System Recommendation Discussion |
ECOM 500 Enterprise System Recommendation Discussion