Elements of Quality Improvement Discussion

December 28, 2022

Elements of Quality Improvement Discussion

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10

Instructions:

Elements of Quality Improvement Discussion

Introduction. Briefly review your practice problem and include a purpose statement. Include data to support the problem.

Evidence-Based Practice Plan Explanation

Provide a detailed explanation of the evidence-based practice quality improvement plan that you will use to address the practice problem.

Support your plan with scholarly references (the sources you found in the analysis of the evidence).

Resources

Describe the resources needed to support the change in practice such as personnel time, supplies for staff education, cost of new equipment, or cost of software.

Explain why each resource is necessary.

Conclusion

Discuss all key points addressed in this assignment.

For the last paper we did this is the feedback I received – This paper did not include data on falls. It focused more on defining elements of quality improvement rather than a literature review of best practices to prevent falls. This paper should be formatted in a narrative rather than these multiple headings and small paragraphs, very limited references. Please keep working on this one for a complete paper to be submitted in Week 5. I have included the attachment for the paper before that we will continue to write from can you please add what we missed the other week thank you.

Copy of Paper to cont. writing on

Elements of Quality Improvement Discussion

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met

You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow