Emerging New Technologies in Early Childhood Education
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Emerging New Technologies in Early Childhood Education
Most of you are novices in academic writing and it would be normal for you to earn a novice grade on your very first writing assignment. Again, “Proficient” is not the equivalent of a B, it is higher than that. If you are writing proficiently, it would mean that you are on-track for doctoral success…probably this would be considered by most to be an A.
To prepare:
- Review the required readings, media, and resources.
- Use your citation management software and Boolean logic, as you seek evidence from the literature that justifies pursuing this research problem.
- Download the Writing Assignment Template and Exemplar from the Week 2 course announcement.
By Day 7
To complete:
The Week 2 Assignment should be written in correct APA style and should include the following:
To Complete In your prospectus document include:
- The working title
- Problem statement
- Three to five key citations that highlight the relevance and currency of the problem (these should be current—within the last 5 years)
- Evidence of the problem in the research literature (and locally, for the project study)
Use the template provided in the announcements, discussion board, and Doc Sharing!
Note that I often highlight the most important revisions needed in blue.
Novice Emerging Proficient Advanced Points 1 (10%) Fulfills minimal expectations of the assignment. Key components are not included.
1.6 (16%) Most parts of assignment are completed. Topics are not fully developed.
1.8 (18%) All parts of the assignment are completed, with fully developed topics.
2 (20%) Assignment exceeds expectations, integrating additional material, information, or both.
1.1 Adherence to Assignment Expectations 1 (10%) Assignment demonstrates minimal understanding of the course or module’s criteria.
1.6 (16%) Assignment demonstrates some understanding of the course or module’s criteria.
1.8 (18%) Assignment demonstrates a clear understanding of the course or module’s criteria.
2 (20%) Assignment demonstrates an exceptional understanding of the course or module’s criteria.
1.1 Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas 1 (10%) Shows a minimal understanding of the assignment’s purpose.
1.6 (16%) Shows some degree of understanding of the assignment’s purpose.
1.8 (18%) Demonstrates a clear understanding of the assignment’s purpose.
2 (20%) Demonstrates a clear understanding of the assignment’s purpose as well as the intellectual ability to explore and implement key instructional concepts.
1.1 Assimilation and Synthesis of Ideas 1 (10%) Does not include specific information from course videos or required readings.
1.6 (16%) Minimally includes specific information from course videos or required readings.
1.8 (18%) Includes specific information from course videos or required readings to support major points.
2 (20%) Demonstrates exceptional inclusion of major points, using creditable sources, in addition to course videos or required readings.
1.1 Written Expression and Formatting 1 (10%) The quality of writing, APA formatting, or both are minimally acceptable for advanced graduate level work. The writing has many grammatical or mechanical errors. (1 point) The writing includes some attempt to convey ideas, but they need to be expressed more clearly and concisely.
1.6 (16%) Somewhat represents scholarly, advanced graduate-level writing. The writing shows more than a few grammatical or mechanical errors. Generally, follows APA style, but the elements of effective communication, such as an introduction and conclusion, are not included.
1.8 (18%) Work is well organized and uses mostly correct APA formatting throughout with few, if any, grammatical or mechanical errors.. The elements of effective communication, such as an introduction and conclusion, are included.
2 (20%) Work represents scholarly writing in correct APA format; effective sentence variety; and clear, concise, powerful expression. The entire piece is well organized and includes an introduction and conclusion.
1.1 Total Points: 10 5.5 Name: EDDD_8003_Week2_Assignment_Rubric
Research Problem Paper
Problem Statement Comment by Steve Wells: Audio Comments: https://share.vidyard.com/watch/ZLeV3ja7vwvqokcqdadgxJ?
Emerging New Technologies in Early Childhood Education
A problem statement communicates to individuals, businesses, and institutions about a current problem affecting operations. Early childhood educational specialization is prone to multiple issues, including inadequate teaching and learning resources, lack of government goodwill, and financial constraints to facilitate teaching operations.
Poor teaching programs and environments for the ECDE teachers, poor remuneration, and high pupil-teacher ratio are among the challenges facing the implementation of early childhood education. Early childhood development literature evolves from the “first generation” research, which emphasized the pupils’ problems and challenges, and never focused much on the instructors and their specific roles and responsibilities.
The traditional approaches failed to satisfy early childhood learners and teachers; thus, a permanent solution should be a priority for the education industry players. Traditional methods do not align with family goals and preferences, and the need for a modern approach for early childhood education is inevitable (Huda et al., 2017). Comment by Steve Wells: You can delete most of this. Please follow the template that I provided. Please find it in the gradebook. No points deducted.
The problem is the emerging new technologies in early childhood education, presenting challenges to the learners. The current generation is characterized by technophiles students who love playing video games from their electronic gadgets (smartphones, iPods, or social networks).
The emerging technology is changing the view of education because early childhood students prefer learning from their devices, resulting in increased pressure from the government to facilitate a shift to instructions from teacher-to-learner-centered approaches. Educators love new technologies but lack the know-how to implement and impact learners’ lives and unlock their interests.
Teachers face multiple challenges in using technology successfully, which prevent effective large-scale technology implementation. Teachers love using traditional approaches over new technology, but a shift to emerging technology is inevitable; thus, a responsive curriculum is needed to facilitate the change. Comment by Steve Wells: This is too broad. What do you mean by technologies? Be far more specific and precise.
Then provide 3 to 5 citations to show that the problem exists. I think this vid might help you. Problem Statement Part 1 Comment by Steve Wells: Need citation here. Comment by Steve Wells: Need citation. Only make assertions with support from the literature. Please review the following: http://academicguides.waldenu.edu/writingcenter/writingprocess/logicalfallacies https://owl.purdue.edu/owl/general_writing/academic_writing/logic_in_argumentative_writing/fallacies.html
The deficit model of education negatively impacts early childhood education because it focuses on what the learners do not know instead of teaching what they already know. Learners find it difficult to learn new things and ideas. “As a result, families are provided with isolated, decontextualized programs or activities which often add to their burden of responsibilities” (Aydin et al., 2017). The old model does not allow children to adequately interact with parents and instructors and experience events beyond early intervention programs.
The emerging technology threatens the education industry, especially the interaction between students and educators. An overwhelming call for the researchers to dig deep into the matter and determine the technological impacts on the current education generation and models to link the indigenous knowledge base with the technological requirement and impact students is vital. Comment by Steve Wells: Thanks for the good effort, but please read the instructions for the assignment and use the template attached to the gradebook.
References
Aydin, H., Ozfidan, B., & Carothers, D. (2017). Meeting the challenges of curriculum and instruction in school settings in the United States. Journal of Social Studies Education Research, 8(3), 76-92.
Huda, M., Jasmi, K. A., Hehsan, A., Mustari, M. I., Shahrill, M., Basiron, B., & Gassama, S. K. (2017). Empowering children with adaptive technology skills: Careful engagement in the digital ınformation age. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 9(3), 693-708.
Emerging New Technologies in Early Childhood Education
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow