Emerging Technologies for the Enterprise
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Emerging Technologies for the Enterprise
BIN3025-N-BF1-2021
ECA – PARt 2
Individual Assessment
Name & Surname
Student Number
SUBMISSION DATE
Word count
Table of Contents Acknowledgment 2 Conclusion 2 refrences 3
Table of figures
No table of figures entries found.
introduction
- Tell the reader about your chosen digital technology.
- Tell the reader why it is worth discussing your chosen technology.
- Tell the reader about the structure of the essay and what is expected to be read in each of the sections below.
Name of your chosen digital technology goes here – 20%
- Define your chosen technology.
- Take two definistions and compare them and let the reader know which definition you choose and why?
- Tell the reader why it is important to consider if the chosen digital tech is emergent or not.
- In this section use the attributes introduced by Rotole, Heeks and Martin’s (2015) seminal paper and clrealy argue for and against on why your chosen digital tech is qualified to be known as emergent.
- You can use other journal and conference papers to support your arguemnet.
context and use cases – 25%
- Tell the reader about the context in which you would like to discuss the use cases of the chosen digital tech.
- Discuss different use cases of the chosen digital tech.
- What is the most common use case?
- What are the values?
- What are the issues?
- Create a table of all values and issues.
Note: In this section you should demonstrate a deep engagemnet with the literature.
a socio-technical approach to the use case – 15%
- Use Evans (2017) model to discuss the most common use case.
- Provide a critique on Evans (2017) model.
- First, by telling the reader how Evans Model could be seen from socio-technical perspective.
- Second, by showing your awareness of critiques of the socio-technical approach.
- Third, by arguing why socio-technical approach is not sufficient to understand all the values and issues.
A multi-modal approach to the USe CASE – 25%
- Introduce a multi-modal theory.
- Run a multi-modal analysis of all the issues and values.
- Demonstarte the result of your analysis in one or two tables.
- Compare and contrast the results.
implications for decision makers – 15%
- Discuss the implications of your analysis from the previous section.
- Discuss the implications for the decision-makers (politicians, managers, etc)
- Tell the reader what have you discussed in this essay
- What is the key takeaway?
- Priority goes to journal articles, then to conference articles , then to the book chapters
Please Note: Avoid citing and referencing blogs and wikipedia
Page | 2
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow