ENG 102 Holyoke the hammer of Thor Essay

September 16, 2022

ENG 102 Holyoke the hammer of Thor Essay

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

ENG 102 Holyoke the hammer of Thor Essay

I wanted to do the close reading and written analysis on the symbolism of Thors hammer in the Norse mythology of “The hammer of Thor” http://www.gutenberg.org/files/37488/37488-h/37488…

Essay I: The Close Reading Essay

For this essay, you will do a close reading and written analysis of one or more texts from unit one. You will be tasked with choosing a specific literary device and evaluating the way that device is used in your chosen text(s). The most obvious devices you may choose to write about are theme, characterization, symbolism, and allegory. These four devices are commonly found in the myths and fairy tales we’ll be reading for class. However, you may choose any literary device to focus on.

Sex, Love, and Intimacy Discussion

I’m working on a writing discussion question and need an explanation and answer to help me learn.

? What have you learned in the course about representations of sex, love, and intimacy that you didn’t know before?

How have the past few weeks contributed to your own ideas of what the future of intimacy can look like?

What information, frameworks, or issues do you think we must consider in order to have more supportive and liberated conversations around sexuality and intimacy?

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met