English Discussion and Genre Analysis

July 16, 2021

English Discussion and Genre Analysis

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

English Discussion and Genre Analysis

Write an essay on one aspect of discourse analysis that we have covered in this semester.

It will be divided into two sections:

Discuss your chosen topic in connection to relevant literature in the first half of the essay (approximately 500words).

Second section of the essay: Choose a real-life situation and explore how you can use (or adapt) the theoretical knowledge you’ve gained about your selected topic (approximately 700 words).

IMPORTANT

– Cite scholarly sources consult the specified readings for each week, as well as other academic sources. Use at least six credible sources.

– Follow the APA style when referencing in the text.

– At the end, make a reference list using the APA format.

– Be critical; offer your thoughts/opinions and explain why you agree or disagree with the hypothesis.

– Support your beliefs and ideas with real-life examples.

– Use proper grammar and paragraph structure while writing in academic English.

grammatical and spelling errors

– Stick to a word count of 1200 words (+/-10%).

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met