ENT 588 Angel Investor Presentation Essay

September 18, 2022

ENT 588 Angel Investor Presentation Essay

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

ENT 588 Angel Investor Presentation Essay

This is the second part of the team assignment. I will post teacher eval as soon as i receive it. I have attached the grading guide. My part of this assignment has my name in bold following bullet.

Two slides per bullet is required.

Evaluate your instructor’s feedback on the outline for the mock presentation from Week 2.

Determine what was missing, or what needs to be changed in your presentation.

Develop support for your Week 3 outline in a 10- to 15-slide presentation with speaker notes, or narration, including:

Include your elevator pitch. -TERESA

Explain your executive summary. -TERESA

Describe your company and management overview.

Explain your products and services, target market, and strategy implementation.

Explain your financial plan.

Include use of funds, team development and utilization, growth forecasts for 3 years, and projected revenues.

Explain your exit strategy for yourself and any investors.

RUBRIC

Excellent Quality

95-100%

Introduction

45-41 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Literature Support

91-84 points

The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.

Methodology

58-53 points

Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.

Average Score

50-85%

40-38 points

More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.

83-76 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.

52-49 points

Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.

Poor Quality

0-45%

37-1 points

The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.

75-1 points

Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.

48-1 points

There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met