Environmental Science Power Point Presentation

Environmental Science Power Point Presentation

Order ID:89JHGSJE83839

Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago

Pages:5-10

Instructions:

Environmental Science Power Point Presentation

WATER FOOD NEXUS Is the paper and power point topic. 1. Minimum 3000 Words (This does not include a reference page, cover page, Figures, and Tables).

2. All texts, except the Abstract in Single Spacing Times New Roman-12 Fonts with a page margin – 1” x 1”
3. A cover page with:
4. the title of the paper,
5. student’s name,
6. Course name & the Course Number, d. Course given semester.
7. Contents and Order of the Report:
8. (one-paragraph) Abstract (in 200-300 words, in Single Spacing, Times New Roman, and

10 font-size);

1. Introduction – Introduce any relevant background knowledge, for example, give

definitions on terms and discuss the history of the topic;

1. Issues – Explain why this topic is important, list the significance, concerns, impacts and

challenges of the topic;

1. Data – Use relevant data to provide any detail explanations for the issues brought up to

explain how sever or significant the issue is;

1. Analysis/Discussion – Provide your discussions or analysis on the topic, solving the

issues and mitigate the impacts/consequence;

 

1. Conclusion – (in 300-400 words) Highlight the important findings you draw through the topic investigation;
2. Reference(s).
3. Reference(s) in text: references should be linked by numbers or name(s) of the authors in the text —
4. Placement: references are cited in the text by the author’s surname, the publication date of the work, and a page number if necessary. Full details are given in the reference list. Place them at the appropriate point in the text. If they appear within parenthetical material, put the year with commas.
5. With a quotation: This is the text, and Smith (2012) says “quoted text” (p.1), which supports my argument.
6. Author: one author: Smith (2012) or (Smith, 2012)

Two authors: Smith and Jones (2012) or (Smith & Jones, 2012)

Three to five authors: At first mention: Smith, Jones, Khan, Patel, and Chen (2012) or (Smith, Jones, Khan, Patel, & Chen, 2012). At subsequent mention: Smith et al. (2012) or (Smith et al., 2012)

Six or more authors: Smith et al. (2012); (Smith et al., 2012) No author: Cite first few words of title (in quotation marks or italics

depending on journal style for that type of work), plus the year: (“Study Finds,” 2007)

1. The Power-Point, Presentation should be submitted with the Term Paper, in a PDF-file.
2. A (5-min) Power-Point Presentation on your project.

Environmental Science Power Point Presentation

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!