Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
Essay on Nuclear Energy’s Use
Week 3 Conflicting frames of view Review: Part 1
The job is split into two sections: a pre-writing paper for this week (Part 1) and the essay for Week 5 (Part 2).
Overview
How frequently do you try to overcome tendencies towards your own point of view when looking for information regarding a certain issue?
This task asks you to play the “Create Game” in this part of critical thinking. The Believing Game is about “believing” the reasons of a contradictory position of a question or at least considering them.
Instructions
During Week 2, you explored the preconditions stated in Chapter 2 of the site material and examined one of the subjects relating to the pros & cons of controversial subjects. You can utilize the same topic or discover another one in this discussion:
Choose one of these themes from Pros & Controversial issues, explain your stance and identify three premises (reasons) stated in the Pro or Con section, whichever is the opposite.
These “believing” questions provided by Elbow answer the three premises (reasons) which conflict with your position on the matter:
What is this point of view interesting or helpful?
If I believed this view, what would I notice?
What would this theory be true for or under which conditions?
Read the passage on processes of critical thought: The game, and how to produce more fruitful [PDF] conflicting views.
Practice your thoughts in order to examine them.
The document should follow clear and organized written guidelines:
Include a paragraph introducing and closing.
Tell the major concepts with a subject phrase and supporting phrases in the corpus paragraphs.
Follow standard grammar, punctuation, mechanics, and orthography rules in English.
There is no page requirement for this prewriting project.
At the moment, references to the assignment are not required.
The application of Strayer Writing Norms is required in this course. See the Strayer Writing Standards link on the left menu of your course for guidance and information. Check for further instructions with your professor.
The specific results of the course related to this task:
Talk about 5th Week Conflicting ideas of view Review: Part 2
OVERVIEW
How frequently do you strive to withstand distortions of your point of view when searching for facts regarding a certain issue?
This task asks you to participate in this crucial component of thinking.
INSTRUCTIONS
Write a paper of 3-4 pages where you:
State your position on the subject you have chosen for the week 3 assignment, Essay: Part 1: Part 1.
Identify three premises (rationale) of controversial issues supporting your position and explain the reasons for your selection.
Explain the “believing” questions about your viewpoint in the three areas of controversial issues Explain your answers.
Examine at least two kinds of prejudices you have probably experienced when assessing your location for and against.
Discuss the consequences of your own enculturation or group identification on your partialities.
Discuss if after playing the “Believing Game” your thinking has changed, even when your viewpoint on the matter has remained the same.
For clear and organizing writing, the paper should follow guidelines:
Include the opening section and the final section.
Address the primary topics with a thematic sentence and phrases in the corpus paragraphs.
Comply with normal English language, punctuation, mechanics, and orthographic rules.
To support your writing, use four sources. Choose reputable, relevant and appropriate sources of information. Quite at least one source in your assignment specified on your source page. Access the library or examine library instructions for support of research, writing and citation.
The use of strayer writing standards is necessary for this course. Please see the Strayer Writing Standards link in the left menu of your course for guidance and information. Check for further instructions with your professor.
The exact results of the course linked to this task:
Examine the partialities involved in evaluating the premise of the particular problem.
Related premises to a position on a particular matter.
Essay on Nuclear Energy’s Use
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Essay on Nuclear Energy’s Use |
Essay on Nuclear Energy’s Use