Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 | Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago | Pages:5-10 |
Instructions:
AT LEAST TWO OF THE FOLLOWING QUESTIONS should be considered and answered:
1. The Campaign for Commercial-Free Childhood thinks that banning or severely restricting advertising and marketing in children’s environments would improve their overall quality of life. Do you agree with or disagree with this viewpoint? Why do you think that is?
2) What does “ethical advertising” entail? Can you conceive of (or locate) an example of a particularly ethical OR particularly unethical advertising campaign or marketing strategy aimed towards children?
3)What recommendations would you make to: If you were on an advisory board set up to advocate for more ethical and advertising marketing for children, what would you make to:
CARU c)The Federal Trade Commission a)Parents and carers of young children b)CARU c)The Federal Trade Commission (FTC)
2. Watch the video below, think about it, and respond:
“Mirrors and Windows: Why Do Children Need to See Theirself in the Media They Watch?”
As part of your response, consider the following questions:
1) What portions of the discussion did you find particularly fascinating or instructive? Which points or topics drew your attention the most?
2) How would you respond to the following question: “What does diversity in children’s media mean?”
3) Can you think of any examples of children’s media that excel at representing diversity, inclusiveness, and representation?
RUBRIC |
||||||
Excellent Quality 95-100%
|
Introduction
45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Literature Support 91-84 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned. |
Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met. |
|||
Average Score 50-85% |
40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided. |
83-76 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration. |
52-49 points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met. |
|||
Poor Quality 0-45% |
37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided. |
75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration. |
48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met |
|||
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow
Essay on the Meaning of Diversity, Inclusion, and Representation |
Essay on the Meaning of Diversity, Inclusion, and Representation