Ethical Boundaries and Practices Paper
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Ethical Boundaries and Practices Paper
Write 800 words with references.
On professional ethical boundaries and practices, complete the step below
Write from the perspective that you are a mental health professional in the field. Provide a thoughtful response to each of the following two sections, including specific, concrete examples to illustrate your ideas. Your final deliverable should be one solid paper addressing each section along with an introduction and conclusion. Use the section headings provided below to separate each section of your paper.
Section 1: Boundary Issues and Dual Relationships write 500 words with references
Part A – Decision-Making Model and Examples
How would you determine if a boundary-crossing or dual relationship is ethical and appropriate?
What criteria would you consider when making your decision?
Present examples of how you would apply this criterion to at least two professional situations in which you believe the dual relationship issues are complex and ambiguous. One of your examples should address the issues of physical attraction between clients and professionals.
Part B-Ethical Issues and Dimensions in Ethical Decision-Making
Examine these issues in terms of encountering former clients. Address the following:
- Do the ethical issues (and your opinion about appropriateness) change, depending on how long after the termination of services a dual relationship is initiated?
- What are the key ethical dimensions that might change, after the termination of services?
- Present an example of a situation that you believe would constitute a boundary violation with a current client but might be acceptable with a former client.
Section 2: Development of Your Thinking about Ethics write 300 words and references
Clearly describe what you consider the most important developments in your thinking about ethical practice that have occurred so far. This may include areas in which you have clarified your views and beliefs, modified your thinking on a given issue, gained new insights, or acquired a new perspective.
It may include issues whose complexity you now appreciate more fully or difficult issues that you now understand you must come to grips with, as a counselor. What have you most learned about yourself and/or about what constitutes becoming an ethical practitioner and how has you’re thinking about ethics and legal issues changed?
Be sure to include specific examples to illustrate general statements.
Ethical Boundaries and Practices Paper
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow