Ethical Conflicts Related to Psychological Assessment Discussion

Ethical Conflicts Related to Psychological Assessment Discussion

Instructions:

Ethical Conflicts Related to Psychological Assessment Discussion

Please answer each question pertaining to psychology. Please APA format and provide refences.

Due by Thursday Morning.

Evaluate or give an example of an ethical resolution processes that pertain to conflicting organizational interests.

What are some ethical conflicts related to psychological assessment in forensic cases?

What mitigating factors can make resolving ethical issues difficult in clinical settings?

How can the APA Ethics Code and enforceable standards assist psychologists in resolving such issues? Ch 4

5. Can the APA Ethics Code assist psychologists in resolving ethical conflicts with conflicting organizational interests? Why or why not? Which interests should predominate when conflicting interests occur? Why? ch 4
6. How can a psychologist minimize the ethical issues related to conducting a forensic assessment? What actions do the APA Ethics Code require? What possible challenges could you encounter?
7. We are to take ‘reasonable steps’ to maintain ethics in the workplace.  See if you can think of some examples of reasonable steps for the following:

You are a psych intern at a major HMO organization in an outpatient psych department.  You see only children and adolescents.  One practitioner goes by the company rules and if the child (by no fault of their own) is late for appointments by 1-2 minutes every time.  The practitioner refuses to see that child because then he can spend that hour catching up on charting of his other clients.

You are a psych intern at a rural mental health clinic with two psychologists to supervise you.  One of the psychologists does not like to teach so won’t supervise you.  The other psychologist that does supervise you constantly ‘name drops’ some of his local celebrity client’s issues without it really being a teaching moment.

You are a new psychologist in a midtown practice.  You specialize in eating disorders.  One of the other practitioners refuses to refer eating disordered clients to you because they want the income from them.

You are in a PhD practicum and it is the expectation of the site that as an intern you go pick up your child clients, see them in the office, and then return them home in your personal car.  “It’s the way we do things here” is the answer as to why it is done this way.

Class: what could you do in each case

4. How can psychologist provide ethical information to courts give an example

Ethical Conflicts Related to Psychological Assessment Discussion

RUBRIC
Excellent Quality 95-100%	Introduction 45-41 points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.		Literature Support 91-84  points The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.			Methodology 58-53 points Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score 50-85%	40-38 points More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.		83-76  points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.			52-49  points Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality 0-45%	37-1 points The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.		75-1 points Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.			48-1 points There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Ethical Conflicts Related to Psychological Assessment Discussion

Ethical Conflicts Related to Psychological Assessment Discussion

PLACE THE ORDER WITH US TODAY AND GET A PERFECT SCORE!!!