Ethical Decision-Making and Process of Ethical Decision Making
Order ID:89JHGSJE83839 Style:APA/MLA/Harvard/Chicago Pages:5-10 Instructions:
Ethical Decision-Making and Process of Ethical Decision Making
Ethical Decision-Making Paper Instructions
The purpose of this assignment is to develop the ability to apply professional values, codes of ethics, and a decision-making model to the process of ethical decision making.
Your paper must be in current APA format. The body of your paper must be 6–9 pages, the abstract must be 150–250 words, and your paper must include at least 6 references (be sure to provide a web address for state rules/regulations). Your paper must be well-thought-out and demonstrate critical thinking.
Choose 1 of the ethical dilemmas on the document entitled Ethical Decision-Making Paper Scenarios. Read and analyze the chosen scenario, applying the American Counseling Association’s (ACA) decision making model as outlined in the document
“A Practitioner’s Guide to Ethical Decision Making.” Divide the body of your paper—formatted in current APA style—into the steps outlined in the ACA document, making sure to address all questions for each section. The steps from the ACA document (Forester-Miller & Davis, 1996) are outlined below.
Identify the problem
Outline the facts.
Correctly identify the problem.
Identify the problem as an ethical, legal, professional, or clinical.
Identify the problem as related to self, client, institution, or agency.
Apply the ACA Code of Ethics
Identify all applicable ACA ethics codes.
Determine the nature/dimensions of the dilemma
Correctly identify moral principles of the profession.
Identify the relevant professional literature that applies to the dilemma.
Identify persons that would be consulted.
Identify state or national professional associations that would be consulted.
Potential courses of action
List all potential courses of action.
Consider consequences/Determine course of action
Describe the potential consequences and implications for each course of action.
Identify the best course of action and explain why.
Evaluate the selected course of action
Review the selected course of action to see if it presents any new ethical problems.
Apply the tests of justice, publicity, and universality.
Implement the course of action
Describe what steps will be taken to implement the course of action.
agency.
Apply the ACA Code of Ethics
Identify all applicable ACA ethics codes.
Determine the nature/dimensions of the dilemma
Correctly identify moral principles of the profession.
Identify the relevant professional literature that applies to the dilemma.
Identify persons that would be consulted.
Identify state or national professional associations that would be consulted.
Potential courses of action
List all potential courses of action.
Consider consequences/Determine course of action
Describe the potential consequences and implications for each course of action.
Identify the best course of action and explain why.
Evaluate the selected course of action
Review the selected course of action to see if it presents any new ethical problems.
Apply the tests of justice, publicity, and universality.
Implement the course of action
Describe what steps will be taken to implement the course of action.
Forester-Miller, H., & Davis, Thomas (1996). A Practitioner’s Guide to Ethical Decision Making. American Counseling Association.
Step 1: Submit your paper via the SafeAssign draft link in Module/Week 7.
Step 2: Wait until the link indicates that SafeAssign has analyzed your paper and prepared a report.
Step 3: Evaluate the report. You will notice that SafeAssign often matches on headings, titles, and references. If you see matches on entire sentences or paragraphs that are not enclosed in direct quotation marks, then you have unintentionally plagiarized. You will need to go back and re-write those sections in your own words.
Step 4: Submit the final paper using the second SafeAssign link. If the final paper you submit contains entire sentences or paragraphs that have a high similarity index to other sources, it may indicate either unintentional or intentional plagiarism. You may be contacted by your instructor.
When you have completed your paper, save it as a Microsoft Word document under your name and assignment title (Example: Doe_J_Ethical_Minute_Paper).
Submit your final assignment via SafeAssign by 11:59 p.m. (ET) on Sunday of Module/Week 7.
Ethical Decision-Making and Process of Ethical Decision Making
RUBRIC
Excellent Quality
95-100%
Introduction 45-41 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Literature Support
91-84 points
The background and significance of the problem and a clear statement of the research purpose is provided. The search history is mentioned.
Methodology
58-53 points
Content is well-organized with headings for each slide and bulleted lists to group related material as needed. Use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. to enhance readability and presentation content is excellent. Length requirements of 10 slides/pages or less is met.
Average Score
50-85%
40-38 points
More depth/detail for the background and significance is needed, or the research detail is not clear. No search history information is provided.
83-76 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is little integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are included. Summary of information presented is included. Conclusion may not contain a biblical integration.
52-49 points
Content is somewhat organized, but no structure is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects, etc. is occasionally detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met.
Poor Quality
0-45%
37-1 points
The background and/or significance are missing. No search history information is provided.
75-1 points
Review of relevant theoretical literature is evident, but there is no integration of studies into concepts related to problem. Review is partially focused and organized. Supporting and opposing research are not included in the summary of information presented. Conclusion does not contain a biblical integration.
48-1 points
There is no clear or logical organizational structure. No logical sequence is apparent. The use of font, color, graphics, effects etc. is often detracting to the presentation content. Length requirements may not be met
You Can Also Place the Order at www.collegepaper.us/orders/ordernow or www.crucialessay.com/orders/ordernow Ethical Decision-Making and Process of Ethical Decision Making
Ethical Decision-Making and Process of Ethical Decision Making